CJP's Hindutva silence tests broad coalition after Bengal killing

New Delhi: The Cockroach Janta Party's refusal to explicitly name anti-Muslim violence is becoming a fault line within its own coalition, even as the movement claims its biggest wins — the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and a Supreme Court order quashing FIRs against protesters.

On August 13, Sheikh Abdul Hafiz, a 27-year-old CJP activist and law student, walked into Karishunda Paschimpara Primary School in Bankura district, West Bengal, to audit basic facilities as part of the party's "School Thik Karo" campaign. Two nights later, a group of men attacked his home. His father, 46-year-old Sheikh Mohammad Mafik, died shielding him. Police have arrested eight people, including a local BJP booth president, Ashtam Majhi.

The killing, reported by The Wire and India Today, has sharpened a debate that has shadowed CJP since its July peak: can a movement built on a satirical insult and a narrow set of education demands survive India's deepest political divide without taking a stand on it?

"We don't want to divert ourselves from education"

In an interview with New Lines Magazine published September 1, CJP national secretary Aafreen Nawaz — herself Muslim — defended the silence. "We don't want to divert ourselves from education. If we start talking about Hindutva or on a religious basis, there is no difference between us and BJP-Congress," she said. Nawaz acknowledged anti-Muslim bias in Indian society but insisted the movement's issue-based focus was deliberate. "If education is fixed, the next generation will make better decisions. As a Muslim, I have never felt out of place in this team — our principles align."

The statement reflects a calculated bet: that a cross-identity youth coalition can hold together by staying strictly on education, exams, and school infrastructure. CJP co-convenor Saurav Das has repeatedly echoed this framing. When asked about Umar Khalid — a jailed student leader who has become a symbol of anti-Muslim state action — Das told Maktoob the question had "nothing to do with the movement."

"A movement cannot ignore what kills its own volunteers"

Critics inside and outside the coalition disagree. Neha Bora, president of the All India Students' Association (AISA) who held a 23-day hunger strike alongside CJP at Jantar Mantar, called the attack on Hafiz and his father a "communal attack and murder." She has demanded the CJP explicitly confront Hindutva politics. "To win back our country, the BJP and Hindutva must be uprooted from Indian soil," Bora said at a public event.

Muzzammil Imam, activist and brother of jailed scholar Sharjeel Imam, told New Lines: "Since the CJP has been able to build such a large platform, this is an opportunity to raise awareness on these matters too, instead of evading them." He pointed to the replacement of Pradhan by Pralhad Joshi, who previously defended the early release of Bilkis Bano's rapists, as evidence that personnel changes without ideological reckoning change little.

Nida Sultan, a 20-year-old Delhi University student who attended the Jantar Mantar protests for 10 days, said she stopped going after realising "the CJP's inability to take a stand for Muslim students who are in jail, or stand with the Muslims being harassed for participating in their protest."

The Hafiz case: a test the movement did not choose

Hafiz's story makes the abstraction concrete. He joined the Jantar Mantar protest on July 19. On returning to Bankura, he says local BJP workers threatened him over his Delhi visit. On August 13, he visited his childhood school, Karishunda Paschimpara Primary, documented conditions, and spoke to the headmaster. That night, his electricity was cut. A mob arrived with sticks, iron rods and crowbars. Hafiz alleges the headmaster tipped off local BJP workers. His father intervened and was beaten to death.

Hafiz told The Wire he does not want compensation. "Let the government build a world-class school in my father's name with proper facilities... If education spreads, people learn to ask questions. Those in power are afraid of questions."

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke posted on X: "It makes my blood boil that people are being murdered simply for demanding better schools." He did not name the attackers' political affiliation or call it a hate crime. That omission drew criticism on social media.

What the New Lines piece documents

Fatima Khan's September 1 report in New Lines Magazine is the most detailed account yet of the internal tension. It records:

• Mohammad Junaid, a visibly Muslim CJP volunteer who fed protesters for 35 days, was detained by police the night before Pradhan's resignation. He alleged his father was interrogated and family bank details collected. After release, he said CJP leadership had not contacted him.
• Saurav Das initially called Umar Khalid "the bravest" and criticised his incarceration. After CJP's formal founding, he dismissed questions about Khalid as unrelated to the movement.
• On August 15, Prime Minister Modi's "dimagi naxal" (Maoist-minded) remark was widely seen as targeting student protesters. Das objected to the phrase on a TV debate. When a BJP spokesperson said it targeted only pro-Khalid slogans, Das demanded evidence such slogans existed — rather than asking what would be wrong with them.
• Dipke, who publicly identified as Dalit, faced caste-based abuse and an AI-generated image mocking him with a "master's in toilet cleaning" certificate. A woman who threw ink at him at the protest site shouted "Jai Sri Ram."

Apoorvanand, a Delhi University professor and columnist, called CJP's reluctance "disingenuous... Behind this reluctance, what they are hiding is their lack of courage. If they represent the young, they should not suffer from the same weakness that the old secular parties once did, and confront Hindutva head-on."

What remains unverified

The exact affiliation of the eight arrested men beyond Ashtam Majhi's identification as a BJP booth president by local residents. The West Bengal BJP has denied organisational involvement; Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari called the accused "criminals" regardless of "what flag they carry." The police investigation is ongoing.

Whether CJP's leadership was aware of Junaid's detention and family interrogation in real time, and the full content of internal discussions about posting (or not posting) a message urging protesters to disperse after the July 20 crackdown — Sonam Wangchuk revealed on a podcast that CJP leaders asked him to craft such a message, but it was ultimately not posted.

---

Sources cited:

1. New Lines Magazine, "The Cockroach Movement's Careful Silence Over Hindutva," September 1, 2026 — primary interview-based reporting with CJP leaders (Nawaz, Das), critics (Bora, Imam, Sultan, Apoorvanand), and volunteers (Hafiz, Junaid).
2. The Wire, "BJP Leader Among Eight Arrested for Killing Bengal CJP Activist's Father Over Son's Inspection Visit to School," August 16, 2026 — ground report from Bankura with police confirmation of eight arrests including a BJP booth president.
3. The Wire, "Blood, Grief and the Fight for Education: The Story of Abdul Hafiz," August 2026 — extended interview with Hafiz and his mother Hasina Bibi; details of the August 13 attack, hospital ordeal, and Hafiz's demand for a school as tribute.
4. India Today, "Bengal CJP Protester's Father Beaten to Death in Bengal, 8 Arrested," August 16, 2026 — corroborates death, arrests, and sequence of school visit → threat → attack.