Wednesday, 09 September 2026|
Breaking
MHA proposes Article 371 Chapter K for Ladakh assemblyCJP issues 7 demands after Satya Niketan PG collapse kills 6Hands Off Jantar Mantar: CJP Hits Back After Delhi HC Ransom RemarkSC: States Can Withdraw FIRs Against CJP Student ProtestersDipke Demands PM Modi Apologise for Police Action on '12-Year-Old Girls' at July 20 Sansad MarchMother thanks PM Modi for forgiveness; lawyer disputes FIR as minor's identity questionedBJP CJP Reel Showed Only Muslims, Alt News ReportsStone-Laden Truck at Jantar Mantar: Congress Calls Police Accounts a 'Major Contradiction'CJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Falls Ill Again at Maharashtra ResidenceCJP Protest Girl, 15, Apologises After Video Abusing PM Modi Goes ViralDipke to Modi: Forgive on reel, or withdraw the cases?Rahul Gandhi says government cannot threaten Gen Z into silence over NEET protestsOpposition consolidates behind CJP: Uddhav calls Dipke, Patil claims fingerprint-Aadhaar match, Kerala drops casesPM Modi Forgives Youth Who Abused Him at Jantar Mantar, Asks Not to PunishAAP offers shield to CJP students facing right-wing threatsBihar's 'Gen Alpha' schoolchildren march 4 km for fans, water, toilets — staff salaries cutCops' kin demand justice after CJP Jantar Mantar clashesDipke: BJP goons, not students, attacked Delhi copsDU reopens as students decode 'thinly veiled threats' and Jantar Mantar protestsNoida woman booked over PM remarks at CJP Jantar Mantar protestSupreme Court Refuses Blanket Ban on Pellet Guns in ProtestsSC: Mere Agitation Can't Justify Lathi-Charge on CJP ProtestersDelhi Police Issue Notices to Social Media Platforms Over Offensive Posts Targeting PM ModiRJD MP Manoj Jha Moves SC Over Police Firing on NEET ProtestersCJP declares victory after Pradhan resigns, but protests continue till all demands metHome Ministry Orders GitHub Takedown of Offline Mesh App Bitchat Used at CJP ProtestPM Modi Thanks Students in Second Video as CJP Demands AccountabilityCJP Submits 5-Point Exam Reform Charter in 2-Hour Talks With NaddaDelhi Police Hand Probe of 10 CJP Clashes FIRs to Crime Branch and Special Cell, Deploy AI Facial RecognitionSonam Wangchuk Ends 26-Day Hunger Strike Following Government's Anti-Paper Leak Bill ProposalMHA Orders 6th Mobile Internet Shutdown Around Jantar Mantar as CP Shuts EarlyCJP alleges internet shutdown at Jantar Mantar as 16 Metro stations remain closedCentre Replaces Higher Education Secretary Vineet Joshi Amid Nationwide CJP ProtestsDelhi Metro shuts 16 stations amid CJP protest securityNEET Protests Overflow Jantar Mantar as Fresh Clashes Erupt at Tolstoy MargWhy We Started CJP — And What 'Truth-First' Actually MeansThe Press Release: How CJP Will (And Won't) Talk About ItselfMHA proposes Article 371 Chapter K for Ladakh assemblyCJP issues 7 demands after Satya Niketan PG collapse kills 6Hands Off Jantar Mantar: CJP Hits Back After Delhi HC Ransom RemarkSC: States Can Withdraw FIRs Against CJP Student ProtestersDipke Demands PM Modi Apologise for Police Action on '12-Year-Old Girls' at July 20 Sansad MarchMother thanks PM Modi for forgiveness; lawyer disputes FIR as minor's identity questionedBJP CJP Reel Showed Only Muslims, Alt News ReportsStone-Laden Truck at Jantar Mantar: Congress Calls Police Accounts a 'Major Contradiction'CJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Falls Ill Again at Maharashtra ResidenceCJP Protest Girl, 15, Apologises After Video Abusing PM Modi Goes ViralDipke to Modi: Forgive on reel, or withdraw the cases?Rahul Gandhi says government cannot threaten Gen Z into silence over NEET protestsOpposition consolidates behind CJP: Uddhav calls Dipke, Patil claims fingerprint-Aadhaar match, Kerala drops casesPM Modi Forgives Youth Who Abused Him at Jantar Mantar, Asks Not to PunishAAP offers shield to CJP students facing right-wing threatsBihar's 'Gen Alpha' schoolchildren march 4 km for fans, water, toilets — staff salaries cutCops' kin demand justice after CJP Jantar Mantar clashesDipke: BJP goons, not students, attacked Delhi copsDU reopens as students decode 'thinly veiled threats' and Jantar Mantar protestsNoida woman booked over PM remarks at CJP Jantar Mantar protestSupreme Court Refuses Blanket Ban on Pellet Guns in ProtestsSC: Mere Agitation Can't Justify Lathi-Charge on CJP ProtestersDelhi Police Issue Notices to Social Media Platforms Over Offensive Posts Targeting PM ModiRJD MP Manoj Jha Moves SC Over Police Firing on NEET ProtestersCJP declares victory after Pradhan resigns, but protests continue till all demands metHome Ministry Orders GitHub Takedown of Offline Mesh App Bitchat Used at CJP ProtestPM Modi Thanks Students in Second Video as CJP Demands AccountabilityCJP Submits 5-Point Exam Reform Charter in 2-Hour Talks With NaddaDelhi Police Hand Probe of 10 CJP Clashes FIRs to Crime Branch and Special Cell, Deploy AI Facial RecognitionSonam Wangchuk Ends 26-Day Hunger Strike Following Government's Anti-Paper Leak Bill ProposalMHA Orders 6th Mobile Internet Shutdown Around Jantar Mantar as CP Shuts EarlyCJP alleges internet shutdown at Jantar Mantar as 16 Metro stations remain closedCentre Replaces Higher Education Secretary Vineet Joshi Amid Nationwide CJP ProtestsDelhi Metro shuts 16 stations amid CJP protest securityNEET Protests Overflow Jantar Mantar as Fresh Clashes Erupt at Tolstoy MargWhy We Started CJP — And What 'Truth-First' Actually MeansThe Press Release: How CJP Will (And Won't) Talk About Itself
justice

Gaurav Bhatia files ₹2 crore defamation suit against CJP leaders

BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia files a ₹2 crore defamation suit against Cockroach Janta Party leaders in Delhi High Court over a disputed social media post.

Sameer Joshi, Courts Correspondent·10 Sept 2026 IST·just now·4 min read
Gaurav Bhatia files ₹2 crore defamation suit against CJP leaders
Photo: Source: Hindustan Times

Gaurav Bhatia files ₹2 crore defamation suit against CJP leaders

New Delhi: Bharatiya Janata Party national spokesperson and Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia has moved the Delhi High Court filing a ₹2 crore civil defamation suit against the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and its core leadership over circulating an allegedly fabricated quote attributed to him on social media.

The lawsuit names CJP founder and national convener Abhijeet Dipke, alongside co-conveners Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, as well as the CJP itself as defendants. Bhatia seeks ₹2 crore in damages, an unconditional apology, and a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from publishing, reposting, or circulating allegedly defamatory material concerning him.

"When accusations cross their limits, then the law draws its line. A ₹2 crore defamation lawsuit," Bhatia posted on X announcing the filing. "Tomorrow, every solid argument will echo in the court. The final nail will be hammered into the coffin of lies. No social media trial. No battle of statements. Only facts, evidence, and the rule of law. The test of truth will take place where it should—in the court."

The disputed quote graphic

The controversy traces to a graphic posted on X on September 5 by Das and reposted by Ranka. The graphic falsely attributed a statement to Bhatia referring to right-wing influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj as a "dimagi naxal" (intellectual Naxal). Bhardwaj was remanded to 14-day judicial custody earlier this week by Patiala House Courts for allegedly assaulting Sanjay, the father of teenage student protester Nishu Azad, during the CJP's Jantar Mantar demonstrations.

Bhatia issued a 24-hour ultimatum demanding that Das take down the graphic and tender an unconditional apology. Das deleted the post and acknowledged on X that the graphic was generated using digital tools, but declined to apologize.

"Nonetheless, I challenge any leader in the BJP to repeat this line," Das wrote after taking down the graphic.

When Bhatia publicly announced the high court lawsuit, Das fired back on social media with a caustic swipe referring to an assault on Bhatia by striking lawyers in Uttar Pradesh earlier in 2024: "Hilte dulte Greater Noida court matt poch jana! (Don't reach Greater Noida court by mistake!)"

Dipke similarly responded with mockery on X: "Might need to make a call to Soros bhai."

Plaint targets institutional commentary

Beyond the immediate quote controversy, Bhatia's plaint argues that CJP leadership has demonstrated a systematic pattern of attacking individuals and constitutional institutions.

The plea asserts that Das and Ranka did not engage in fair political commentary: "The defendant no 1 & 2 (Das and Ranka) did not merely engage in criticism, comment or disagreement with any statement actually made by the plaintiff. Rather, defendant no 1 & 2 falsely represented to the public that the plaintiff had made statements, which, in fact, he had never made."

The plaint further alleges that the defendants, operating under what it describes as an unregistered collective claiming no political affiliation, use digital reach to undermine judicial authority. Bhatia's filing highlights Das's past social media commentary on Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma regarding the Delhi excise policy proceedings, as well as remarks concerning the prolonged incarceration of activist Umar Khalid.

"The Defendant No. 1 (Das), while holding himself out as Chief Spokesperson/Co-convenor of an unregistered collective, has chosen to publicly celebrate and endorse an individual facing serious criminal allegations by declaring the judicial process itself to be permanently stained, thereby demonstrating a propensity to use social-media platforms for institutional denigration," the petition states.

What we can verify

  • Filing in Delhi High Court: Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia has filed a civil suit seeking ₹2 crore in damages and a permanent injunction against the CJP, Abhijeet Dipke, Saurav Das, and Ashutosh Ranka. — LiveLaw, The Times of India
  • Originating dispute: The lawsuit arises from a graphic published on September 5 attributing statements to Bhatia regarding Swatantra Bhardwaj. Das deleted the post after Bhatia's 24-hour warning, admitting the quote was falsely generated, but refused to tender an apology. — Hindustan Times
  • Responses on record: Das publicly taunted Bhatia regarding the Greater Noida court incident; Dipke posted a sarcastic quip about contacting George Soros. — Times Now
  • Judicial allegations in plaint: The suit cites social media statements concerning judicial officers and pending criminal trials to argue institutional disparagement. — LiveLaw

What remains unverified

  • Court findings: The allegations in the plaint represent assertions by the plaintiff; the Delhi High Court has not yet issued substantive findings or an interim order on the plea. — [unverified]
#Gaurav Bhatia#Cockroach Janta Party#Delhi High Court#Saurav Das#defamation lawsuit#Swatantra Bhardwaj

Sources cited

CJP policy: every fact in this article is traceable to a public source. We never publish what we cannot verify.

Written by
Sameer Joshi
Courts Correspondent

Got a tip on this story? Our newsroom follows up on every lead. Reach us via the submission page.